<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch out &#8211; New credit card charges on the way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terry.ipearson.net/2009/02/06/watch-out-new-credit-card-charges-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terry.ipearson.net/2009/02/06/watch-out-new-credit-card-charges-on-the-way/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:27:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Robert Lahm</title>
		<link>http://terry.ipearson.net/2009/02/06/watch-out-new-credit-card-charges-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Robert Lahm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terrypearson.com/?p=497#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry,

Thanks for your comment on my site.  I wanted to mention, because it is a pivotal matter relative to the issues with Chase and pending lawsuits, the (so-called) &quot;$10 per month maintenance fee&quot; is a finance charge.  Accordingly, whatever finance charge a customer may have had &quot;Until the balance is paid in full&quot; has indeed been altered.

I am not just being picky about this in correcting the record on your site (or when people comment on my site), rather, this is definitely part of Chase&#039;s PR spin strategy, to minimize the issue by calling it a service charge, a fee, and the like.  But, the fact is, Chase messed up with its own fine print (as I pointed out to Chase Card Services CEO Gordon Smith, in a certified letter sent to him on December 3, 2008).  As stated in the change in terms notice, I quote (panel 2 of 2):

â€œThe charge is $10 per month ($120 total annually), and it is a finance charge.â€

A copy of the actual change in terms notice, the aforementioned letter, and several other related documents can be found under the link category &quot;Correspondence&quot; on my site.

Best wishes to you, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment on my site.  I wanted to mention, because it is a pivotal matter relative to the issues with Chase and pending lawsuits, the (so-called) &#8220;$10 per month maintenance fee&#8221; is a finance charge.  Accordingly, whatever finance charge a customer may have had &#8220;Until the balance is paid in full&#8221; has indeed been altered.</p>
<p>I am not just being picky about this in correcting the record on your site (or when people comment on my site), rather, this is definitely part of Chase&#8217;s PR spin strategy, to minimize the issue by calling it a service charge, a fee, and the like.  But, the fact is, Chase messed up with its own fine print (as I pointed out to Chase Card Services CEO Gordon Smith, in a certified letter sent to him on December 3, 2008).  As stated in the change in terms notice, I quote (panel 2 of 2):</p>
<p>â€œThe charge is $10 per month ($120 total annually), and it is a finance charge.â€</p>
<p>A copy of the actual change in terms notice, the aforementioned letter, and several other related documents can be found under the link category &#8220;Correspondence&#8221; on my site.</p>
<p>Best wishes to you, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  terry.ipearson.net/2009/02/06/watch-out-new-credit-card-charges-on-the-way/feed/ ) in 0.59098 seconds, on Jul 31st, 2010 at 7:53 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jul 31st, 2010 at 8:53 am UTC -->